>>53141162You made a thinly-veiled attempt to make fun of the opposing party so I wanted to address it.
>from the children's gameThis is the most important part of your whole message, so I'm gonna focus on this. You resorted to this because when I challenged your position you realized you may not be able to stand a good ground.
First of all, games aren't the only media Pokemon has. Second, games actually The media that is not aimed just for children, as opposed to the show. The irony here is that the show actually had way more lewd moments than the games.
And finally, even Nintendo recognizes that the big chunk Pokemon audience aren't the kids:
/r/pokemon/comments/dvs2kl/the_majority_of_pokemon_players_are_over_18_years/
So the show and the game, is not being SOLELY aimed at kids, it is only their primary goal, but there is a secondary one they still have in mind.
Now, how any of this related to the argument at hand? Well, you resorted to the reference to try and make my position look small, weak and silly, like "c'mon bro, it just a kids game and you do this and that" and the first step to address this attempt at argument is to prove the franchise as whole is not just "kid's game"
Moreover, I dont even care about the games. I dont play them. So the comparison to games is irrelevant. The reasons you did not mention the show is somewhat obvious, I presume. If it is not, we can return to this point.
Now, The presumption in this remark
> but no weird stuff please > a bit amusing.implies you found it "degenerate", as my original wording was within this context. You did not comment anything on the human on human stuff so I assume you find it normal. Which means, if I'm to request the same scene but with humans that would be okay by your standards? If this is true, then it is not about the core idea of the request itself, but about the character involved? So the problem is the pokemon?
Please elaborate on this, so I can continue my thought further.
