>>39806769>Why? I think I know what my intentions are.Dude, you don't need to triple down on it. I already know that you have nothing.
>now you bitch, bitch, bitch becauseI didn't want you to give your "reasoning", I wanted a yes or no. Instead of that, I apparently get you insulting my intelligence by assuming I don't know about the subject related to what I asked for and being a pretentious prick about the assumptions you made on the nature of the question. I ask if you consider dogs to be wolves; you lecture me on the nature of humanity for what reason? I say I'm not trying to argue (definition: give reasons or cite evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory, typically with the aim of persuading others to share one's view) about that and was just asking a question (a pretty clear indicator I didn't want to get into that stuff) and you chatter on about the basics of the subject matter and continue to press on with lecturing me on the nature of humanity (doing what I said I didn't want to do) for what reason?
>Bad blood? I’m just answering your posts>>39805173>Yes a very dumb one.That's not an answer. That's an attack and if your feelings around it that you reveal afterward are true
>>39805924 "No I was making a factual statement about your question. What you asked was basically like asking me if I consider all races the same as human. Its pretentious, loaded, and dumb to anybody with even an elementary school level understanding of biology." You meant it as an insult at that point which means I was correct to take it as you assuming, for some reason, you needed to educate me on the matter. The way you spoke to me was not the way anyone would speak to someone who they assumed knew what subspecies were, it's the way they would speak to someone who they assumed just wandered into the subject matter and was bumbling around despite me being the one to pick up on what you were referring to when you said that there were wolves in gen 1.
