>>45610526>has absolutely nothing of value to say, sprinkles some ad hom in and yet tells me I'm the one seethingThe thing is, we can argue about the merit of remakes *as a thing* all day. That's fine. But what irks me massively about this is that the vast majority of these people banging on and on about remakes is that they absolutely fail to further the conversation at all. They just know what they don't want [the same thing again], and nebulously pick apart things that make it [the same thing] without any point to make beyond that. Look at retard takes like
>>45607973.
