>>45907523I'll give minimal criticism and comment those designs with arrows, which i thought were the ones which had better or worse designs. I'll start with the ones i find more uninteresting. (its just my opinion)
>MajodonThe wizard theme does not end up looking well with the elephant, at least not that way, the bush hat and its face look weird, If you wanted to make a wizard starter i would try a different animal.
>CrythonI get the themes but it still lacks the charisma and appeal a starter pokemon should have, in my opinion the clown hair makes it look really bad.
>Water starter lineI find the first cute but the rest wouldn't seem to fit the taste of someone who chose such a starter. The second and third stages of all the starter lines ended up looking mediocre. I guess this is probably because you made the first stages first, and then gave them evolutions, in my opinion, doing the opposite and starting with the final stage, makes the whole line look better. Even if you end up with slightly worse first stages, a trainer that were to use them, would want its pokemon to look better as it evolves, not to look worse.
>CocoinI just dislike how unnatural it looks, not that important its only a cocoon middle stage
>SlobberdorIt just looks unappealing to me, it looks like the type of pokemon that practically nobody wound end up getting in their game, but could easily be improved.
>ToweraffeAs a giraffe pokemon, its pretty cool, but dull as a pokemon. I think the main problem is not the design but the giraffe concept, i've never seen a giraffe pokemon/fakemon that looked interesting, i personally think giraffes are not good animals to base pokemon on.
>Quaddle evosQuaddle looks great, but its evos do not. You should scrap them and make a completely new design, if you wanted to give better evos to quaddle
>AtlidA worm pocket monster that fails because it looks like an actual worm. Evolution fixes this and does the worm pocket monster properly
