>>53770551Nope.
>>53770556Can you make a list of moves for Fairy-types that would fit your retconned vision of Fairy that would actually make it work as a defined type? "Cute" actually has a distinction, can be used as an element, and has had an in-game presence since forever (like the move Charm), so there's more basis for it to be a type than just "it's from folklore so it's Fairy" which is so absurdly vague that Magmar could be fucking Fairy.
