>>56476957What are these? There are graphical elements to illustrate the claimant's requiry on the offender of intellectual property. This will be provided alongside the footage they are meant to represent, so to provide evidence to the satisfaction of a court that the offender indeed acted in bad faith.
The issue with every element here is that they are all individual accounts. Which means PalWorks may be acquitted on a few accounts, as a whole they'd have to decharactize their game completely or just hand over all receipts to Nintendo in royalties in a settlement. There is no scenario where PalWorks finishes with a happy ending, they will suffer.
Also, the way this type of court happens in Japan, it is sufficient for PalWorks to be condemned guilty as charged in a single account for Nintendo to do not suffer through compensating legal fees. This means PalWorks will have to divert money from game development and the developers to paying an impossible legal defense.
PalWorld is irreversibly damaged, and nothing has been judged yet.
