Quoted By:
It's impossible to design a pokemon no one will defend. No matter how shit, someone will defend it with their lives.
This is not opinion, it's a FACT.
Now let me explain why I personally am pissed off. First of all, a back library of inanimate objects is no excuse for a bad idea. It's not the fact that it's based on an inanimate object that pisses people off.
We had a chandelier. Oh it's a creepy ghost house chandelier. cool.
Or rotom because he is a poltergeist who possesses stuff. Yeah! okay!
But this? It's a fucking key chain. Nothing cool or exciting about that. And the fact it has modern keys attached just makes it feel less pokemon to me.
nb4
>Hurr durr GF decides what pokemon looks like!
I'd say GF is definitely not running out of ideas. But are they running out of good ideas? Keychain? Sword? Two swords? Digi-evolutions? Just because there is a concept with thought behind it, doesn't mean the ideas are good.
Okay. There's this pokemon. It's basically an ass on a spring. Shitty water is constantly running out of the asshole, splashing everywhere when it bounces around on it's spring.
>Genius! It's based of having diarrhea while on a trampoline!
>Haters gonna hate lol
>I honestly love it!
>But it isn't meant to be taken serious. It's a joke!
>No one can explain why the hate it except "hurr durr it's an ass"
>It has great design.
