>>20353971I don't know why people keep thinking "once per turn this card cannot be destroyed" is supposed to be worthy of a good card.
That's such a useless effect nowadays when you have shit like Beelze
>>203539986 different attributes in your grave for a "once per turn it can't be destroyed" and "you can banish maybe 3 monsters at best" effect is supposed to be better than 4 tributes for "banish all of your opponent's hand, grave and field, if they don't topdeck dark hole, they can't do anything" effect?
That Arceus dies to something stupid like emergency compulsory device