>>37555109This was already explained by someone else.
>>37552781 Honestly, it looks like they're just pointing out that in the franchise, there are humans who collect multiple Digimon, and this being introduced to the franchise then puts it on the entire franchise even though it is contained to these few games. I guess it would be akin to bringing up the Eevee Tamagachi toy coming out next year if someone says that Pokémon games don't focus on the raising aspect of having a Pokémon but doesn't limit the discussion to the main series games, allowing someone to bring up anything in the entire game portion of the franchise, and they would be right in that case. I don't even know anything about Digimon though, so I don't know how accurate that is or how well the game this anon is talking about connects to the other Digimon games in comparison to how this Tamagachi connects to the other Pokémon games. I'll guess it connects a lot better though.
>>37555104>Except it's not false. Read the post it's responding to.I did, and nothing about:
>In Digimon, humans fought as well and had Digimon with them and it was great.-makes:
> Digimon isn't a monster collecting game. It's a virtual pet simulator.-true.
