>>47508042Yeah, when has that deck ever been META? I'm not asking if you were able to make it work, as others have as a ROGUE DECK, but it's not meta or even averagely good. I literally own that deck IRL as the sole deck I play (with some modifications), because I'm a die hard fan, but I'm not going to bullshit Blue-Eye's state in the current game. Anyone who wants to play Dragons has much better options, which are all far more consistent than this. The fact that half of the deck consists of cards that work around the idea of "I'm likely going to brick, so I'm going to trash cards in my hand to draw new ones" should tell you it's problem. The whole deck revolves around the idea of hoping you draw the 6 right cards, or discarding+drawing until you do.