>>557928543/10
I guess granbull is in that weird group of pokemon that is forgettable, but not meme-tier forgettable. I'm not sure I'd call it the worst though.
>>557928755/10
Honestly, gets by just because it was in Gen 3. Looking at it again, Blaziken is kind of a furbait pokemon.
>>557929026/10
On it's own, it's a simple low tier design. The context of what it came from definitely brings it down. Rhyhorn and Rhydon are some of the best Pokemon designs, only to be smirked by this.
>>557929059/10
Based choice. Ambipom is a stupid ass design.
>>557929155/10
Magmortar had a hard life. Magmar is among the worst 1st gen looking pokemon. Where it came from, it really did the best it could do.
>>557929238/10
Lickilicky somehow looks less powerful than Lickitung. If it wasn't bigger, I'd assume this is a pre-evolution. It has a bib for crying out loud
>>557929581 or 9 / 10
The male version is perfectly fine, the female version of Jellicent is ugly as all balls. I guess in the context that you have a contrast of something terrible and something solid, could make it an interesting choice for worst pokemon.
>>557929707/10
OG Worst Pokemon. Jynx has been outclassed though.
>>5579297710/10
Eternatus is just an absolute mess. I have no fucking clue what I'm supposed to be looking at. Definitely worst Pokemon contender.
>>557929838/10
Seismitoad is a groady ass design, but not even in a good way like Weezing or Croagunk. It really feels like it needs to be a poison type, and have some green or purple elements to it.
>>5579298510/10
I forgot this thing existed. Actual fucking atrocious design. Holy shit. Diggersby is a terrible fucking Pokemon
>>557929959/10
Pretty based choice. Capsakid really feels like they had it's evolution first, and then just went "fuck it, that but small". Doesn't help that Scovillain is a low tier design anyway.
>>55793007Dear God / 10
I should've headed the spoiler.