>>14874346>>14874767There have literally never been any Pokémon exclusive to the 3rd version and there is no indication or reason to believe that they would do that, especially with them repeatedly making points against things like DLC and "wanting everyone to have the full game with just one purchase". The only reason we're having this discussion is because people like you two are so booty blasted about "b-but only 69 Pokémon" like it's a big deal. Will there be a Event Pixie? Almost definitely. Will there be more Megas and Event Megas? Definitely. But there's not going to be any more ordinary Pokémon.
>>14874630Except the point was that a 3rd version with completely new content not in X and Y at all is equivalent to paid DLC, which Gamefreak does not do at all. The only form of DLC they do is Event Pokémon, which are neither payed for nor new content
