>>53429328>Bruv it's literally hanging out back to back with Heath, combine this with the fact that Cyclizars are canonically chill as fuck and have let people ride on them for ages means it's not a stretch of logic to say the Raidon made in this Cyclizar's image would have the same temperament as a normal Cyclizar and Heath being pictured with one works as the inspiration.At this point you're just grasping for straws and making assumptions. There is nothing to say about Heath's Cyclizar in regards to the temperament of the Raidon. Even then it would still set a personality template to copy from and a violent Raidon wouldn't exist.
>the Raidon we get is an anomalyYou're tripping over yourself.
First you claim that Heath's Cyclizar was the personality basis and was kind and now you're saying it's an aberration which doesn't make sense using your own logic because the violent one would have come out of nowhere especially after the first came through and showed how docile it was.
>This isn't even getting into how the professor was clearly deranged by the time the second Raidon showed upMoot point, like this anon said
>>53429272 the insanity came on based on the idea of paradise for their family, if it was truly wish granting they wouldn't have been violent because that's not their desire.
>which is why they kept trying till Raidon 2 appearedWhich is another thing, there would be more than two if they really wanted it. And you didn't even address the actual point there about the personality.
>you have no evidence of this claim The evidence is that outside of 4chan the imagination theory is a rarity outside of clickbait youtubers and its only here that sees polls where imagination wins.
Put two and two together and you have someone who's autistically obsessed with the imagination theory and hates being corrected ie you.