>>27492123>>wanting 20 year old art style to be the same todayIf it's good why not? Just because it's old? How shallow. But it's still the most popular artstyle today though, so not much of an argument.
>>thinking that non-stagnent art style is lazyNo I think the current artstyle is lazy. And shit.
Also change for the sake of change won't necessarily improve things.
>>not knowing that the style has changed over time in order to accomodate anime and product needs.I know. How is that something good? People work less so other people will have to work less. Wow.
>>not knowing that pokemon is aimed to kids, so it will reflect what kids like todaySo modern kids don't like gen 1 pokemon, is that what are you saying?
>>not knowing how ilustration worksPlease enlight me.
>>wanting recolours only.I'll take them over shitty redesigns.
>>wanting a literal animal that spits fire, but not thinking that THAT is uncreative/lazyNot different than the same animal suddenly spiting ice? I don't really see what's your point here. I'm not mad about types.
>every damn respectable artist will change his art styleDoesn't mean that the public will react favorably too it.
>Anime HAS changed in the past two and a half decades.Anime artstyle improved instead, compared to some of the monstrosities from the late 90s, early 00s, the opposite of pokemon.
Still doesn't prove much, lot of people still bitch about 80s and early 90s being superior and wanting them back, and plenty of changes in the anime industry can be attributed to laziness or just having to work less in general.
So tl;dr, it's better now and I should accept it because some nip have to work less that way? Is that it?
