>>20411870>proven categorically wrong and has absolutely no facts to back his argument>instead of supporting his own case attempts to attack and dismiss the ever-mounting evidence in favor of the opposition, which has provided further proof whenever challenged>resorts to namecalling>visibly upsetI'd almost think you're false flagging. The butt ranged autismal fanboy act is TOO perfect.
The good news is we're clearly done here, since you've absolutely failed to make any sort of case. The funny news is, I have no doubt you'll be simmering over this all day. Good luck continuing to justify your denial to yourself!
