>>45761247This, everybody who says otherwise is either a paid shill, baiting or legitimately clinging to such minor additions (which were partly already additions of previous games) and willfully ignoring that the overall presentation and game itself compared to the previous entries is mediocre at best. This is the first home console game where semi-revolutionary games, at least for Nintendo's standards, like BotW or Mario Odyssey were released on, and yet, with all the money GF and TPCi has, they released a barely refurbished GameCube game which managed to have less Pokémon and post-game content than the previous games (admittedly maybe surpassing Gen 1), furthermore it's quite evident that they cut these corners for the sake of it or to sell the DLC to those who were unsatisfied the intentionally lackluster post-game and for the shills to start debates over how the DLC system is a better one than third versions, overseeing that the third versions actually had some decent overall content compared to the $90 Switch Pokémon experience.
