>>55249109Lol 2 seconds before you replied I realized flygon was exactly that minus the stats. I'm not sure what IRL bugs would make a cool pseudo, at least those that haven't been used yet. Part of it is that conceptually, in spite of how many species of "bugs", (anything creepy crawly, not necessarily literal insects), there are, they overlap pretty heavily. Just look at how many species of beetles there are
>>55249117Looking at your image, I'm almost envisioning a mon like brundlefly 2. I like the fly sequel a lot, and I think it suffers from being a sequel
