>>50007594He was backing up your post. Though I've no clue why, I'm clearly more fluent in English than most posters on this shitshow of an image board. The sentence flowed better without all those dumb caveats so I omitted them. It still conveys the same message essentially: that other boards' threads = good and /vp/'s = worse and bad. Which is laughable. I really shouldn't have to explain any of this.
