>>28744553I just made the poll first and then the thread second. Sure, I could have explained it, and predicted the arguments to happen, but then I could have also had the slight hope that people wouldn't be such autists and would betray my expectations and wouldn't go on tirades about how I should quit statistics for life because Emerald isn't there.
The thread was basically done in 5 seconds and I just googled pokemon games for the image and thought it was an interesting image showing how the DS era dragged on.
>>28744598Look at the question. What's going to go wrong with my polling?
>someone sees "FAVORITE GAME POLL" >oh boy, time to put emerald>sees clarified poll question upon opening poll link>brain short-circuits >accidentally has a seizure and picks B2/W2, even though originally he would have picked Platinum if Emerald had been an optionMy data answers the question that I wanted answered.
I'm sure your statistics professor would have marked me down if I had one question in one place with another in another place, but there is literally no being confused in answering this question.
You're the guy up your own ass.
