>>40423489>your whole argument falls apart when you realize a "pokemon design tree" isnt real.No shit. It called an analogy dumbass
>Its literally just your opinion on how things panned out.No its not as its rooted in fact unless you are denying GEN 1 Aesthetics ie DESIGNS serve as the bade template for the whole series.
>If voltorb sucks, every pokemon that came after doesnt inherently suck, sorry about your shit theory.See
>>40423344 you moron. You are still attacking your own strawman and with a non sequitur in relation to my actual analogy I SPELT OUT FOR (YOU).
>Talk about strawmans interpretation of the pokemon franchise. And apparently you don’t know what strawman means to boot
>You just mad cause Voltorb is your favorite, indicating that you have shit taste and shit for brains.Incorrect. Red herring, has no bearing on the actual discussion but does indicate how weak your hand is.
