>>553750466/10
A fine take to do a Top 18 rather than a full tier list, though to does mean each pick falls under more scrutiny. You got some pretty odd stinkers in there, like Accelgor, the two megas, and Orbeetle, but solid list of favorites throughout the generations gives this a bit more personality rather than just spamming one gen.
>>553750765/10
Another fairly standard list, weighed down a bit by the clear dex order rather than personal order. Still, distilling the top two bugs as JUST Scizor and Volcarona prevents it from slipping further; as drawing the line from the rest of the popular ones to say "just these two are the top" lets a fairly standard list stand out with a bit more flair
>>5537507710/10
My list, so obviously perfect
>>553750797/10
There's some level of respect I have for someone to put Scizor and Volcarona, some of the clear favorites, in the most unassuming spots possible. Beyond that, I might be WAY off, but I actually think I also see a consistent pattern here. There's clear favoritism to bugs whose eyes seem to be more animalistic. Most of the "Meh" and "Shit" tier are filled with bugs that have some level of intention in their eyes, and so while this list is wildly different from my own, I give some respect to displaying the thought process out.
>>553751034/10
Like a few others that came before it, 4 tiers, when you really only use 3, is just too few to really work with a list this big. Still, the divisions and placements are solid enough to be ranked the highest of the 3-tiered lists.
>>553751679/10
Unapologetically what a 12-14 year old would think is a cool pokemon, and honestly, an incredibly based list for it. You got Mothra, you got even pointier beedrill, all the edgy dead-bugs are S-Tier. You got that spider that drowns people, that bug thats a ninja, the jacked mosquito. And down below you got worms, and moths, and cacoons. It's so incredibly simplistic in it's choices, yet, I appreciate it all the more for that.
