>>39621228>It's 1, sorry. If I wrote it like 8÷2(2+2) then yes, it's 16>8÷2(2+2)>8÷2(4)>4(4)>16Is exactly the same as
>8/2(2+2)>8/2(4)>4(4)>16So where the hell are you getting one? It'd only be one if you expressed it like this 8/(2(2+2)) which becomes 8/(2(4)) which becomes 8/8 and thus is 1.