>>26555697>glitchy messit was the first gen. those aren't part of the main game. you can just avoid them
> horrible battle systemagain, it was the first gen. It wasn't about being competitive, it was about catch them all
>no real storyit's an adventure. it's about discovering a world of pokemon. Pokemon was something new at the time
>wonky spritesclassical sprites. some are good, some are bad. and people complain about sprites even in gen 6
>>26555851>a shit gamea game you don't like it
hoennfagif those were shit games, pokemon would not be a franchise that will last for years.
if the first pokemon games were shit like you're talking, pokemon would have died in gen1
also
>Pokeboomthe "Pokeboom" existed because the earlier games