>>55055865>Did that somehow come from Occulture too, or was it made based on the description in the book?We don't know. It might be in the November issue for all we can tell.
>You're making the mistake of thinking that the descriptions come from Occulture, but they don't.It's the other way around. Their names are taken directly from the book, but their characteristics are pulled from Occulture.
The paradox entries say they are NAMED after monsters/objects in an old expedition journal in the version you play. But in the other one, they RESEMBLE illustrations/entities described in a magazine.
That coupled with the "paradoxes" we actually see in the book being different from the ones we got should immediately make it clear which comes from where.
