>>36795654it gives further concept to octillery's design basis how is it not relevant? i'll admit the beta version is better because it's more overt but the octillery we got is still really solid and i'm glad they didn't go over the top with it otherwise we could've ended up with pic related. and people have known for literally years it was a tank, i mean why did you think it's localised name had artillery in it and it's japanese name is okutank. it's like ampharos being based on a lighthouse and exploud being a pipe organ and munna being an incense burner. they're all based on both objects and animals/monsters
