>>16870116>>16870119But how is it relevant how well I draw? I've given a detailed reasoning about why I think it's wrong; if you don't agree that concepts need elements that link back to a base concept then just say that.
>>16870438How was I saying that? Where did I say ANY designs were shit? How about jumping to assumptions less, my angered friend. Because if there's one thing that actually will piss me off, it's people jumping to assumptions.
That said, my entire post WAS critique. Harsh critique, if I have to clarify for this board, but critique nonetheless with useable information. Even if it WAS just shitflinging with a few bits of truth to it, you don't just disregard it because the person worded it in a way that ruffles your jimmies.
If it does, I don't recommend you going to /ic/ or any real art website in the future, because you gon' gen rekt.
Now, for something unrelated; I post images with ALL of my 4chan posts and i'm going to continue to do so whether you get irrationally mad at it or not.
