>>36547668Not him, but it's an absolutely valid criticism. He even mentioned Pauper, an MTG format where you're only allowed to use low-rarity and cheap cards. And for all the criticism WotC deserves, one thing they do right is balance their commons and uncommons around that format.
Pokemon has the worst filler problem out of any TCG I can think of. In other TCGs like MTG and Pokemon, the filler cards are at least unique or gimmicky or do something different, even if they're shit. In Pokemon, the trash cards are shit like pic related where it's literally unusable, indefensible, and can't be justified by any means. Imagine paying $4 for a pack and pulling this chucklefuck as your rare. And this isn't a cherrypicked result.
