>>57033967>>57033976That is exactly what I did. And the reason he cut it like that is exactly because it disproves his bullshit "theory". According to what he showed us on the first pick the pattern should've been 1 to 1, 2 to 5, 3 to 2, 4 to 3, and 5 to 2.
At the end of the image you can barely make out the results of the last wonderpick. The results were: 1 to 1 (correct), 2 to 2 (incorrect), 3 to 5 (incorrect), 4 to 3 (incorrect), 5 to 4 (the one he picked and acted like it "should've" been right one according to the pattern (also incorrect). Having said that you're free to believe whatever you want. I think you should be more cautious and alert before you blindly trust tricksters like these though.
