>>40006938Not my favorites list, I unironically tried to be objective when rating these pokemon as fire types. Gave importance to concept and originalty over just charismatic designs
>S really represents a monster that embodies fire type>A are original concepts that succeed in matching the fire type to an animal or myth along with an original execution>B can have really good designs, but are fire type because of colorations or simpler concepts>C just have the fire type artificially but still manage to be somewhat interesting>D are poorly executed fire types that have no good reason to be fire types or that have awful designs 