>>57837509In general the "instant shattering" effect you see in some art is accurate. Even with smaller giant girls. It's not just their weight but their ability to generate absurd amounts of force.
>>57834997Like here for example. Because of Bea's size in this instance she would be able to tear through the material of the tower with a minimal level of effort. Consider what a wrecking ball on a crane can do to a structure; that is negligible compared to the amount of force Bea could impart into the tower even if she held back deliberately. The same applies to her footsteps, she would be subjecting the ground to immense levels of kinetic force even if she was trying to be careful and cause as little damage as possible.
Also her body would more or less be invulnerable relative to everything else.
>>57837537Conventionally no.
