>>42494166>VGC is doing fine with dynamaxing!!IT'S A FUCKING DOUBLES BATTLE YOU SMOOTHBRAINED IMBECILE, THE TWO FORMATS ARE COMPLETELY INCOMPARABLE
>Not all megas were bannedBecause you couldn't give literally everything in the game a fucking universal mega stone that came with three turns of overpowered z-moves.
>Landorus is broken by your (my) own logic!....well, yes, but I don't like that thing either and I also refuse to use it. I fucking hate that stupid lion dog thing. He's still preferable to this travesty though. Landorus with Dynamax would be a fucking nightmare.
>except they don't (need ditto or toxapex), depending on what mons are in that meta game after bans and how useful the remaining mons are.Often pex doesn't help, but I refuse to use Toxapex because I fucking loathe the damn thing and I don't want it anywhere near my team. As for "ditto isn't broken/you don't need it" read
>>42494201>>42493891and
>>42493968 has good arguments as well.
If you're being FORCED to run the same two or three pokemon on EVERY SINGLE TEAM, JUST for a chance to beat their Dynamaxer who might not even do it just to whip out the unpredictable card, then yes, the mechanic is overcentralizing.
>waaaaaa but lando's also overcentralizing and by your logic an method of countering him is also overcentralizing waaaaa i want my big boy toys why can't i play with my big boy toooooys WAAAAAAAYou sound like a fucking child. Loads of people hate Landorus for being "overcentralizing", but if you're arguing that using pre-made sets for ANY pokemon in general is overcentralizing (which because your grammer is so fucking poor is what it reads like) then you're an absolute retard and it's no wonder you like the Press X To Win mechanic.
Your opinion means literally nothing.
Also:
>>42494267>just don't max first!And then they dynamax, and then you do the ditto back to them and it's just the same thing again but to the other side.
I keep forgetting vp has too many low elos.
