>>37456740Who are you to say what's a "Goodness" type though? It's still dumb and as other have already pointed out other types have "light" properties as part of the core concept of the type. And just like
>>37456760 said Necrozma would be the #1 Light type but it didn't happen.
I'd understand arguing to make light a property but as a type it's really dumb.
>>37456770Agreed. I feel like your average casualtard doesn't even understand how properties work. If they have to handhold the player every game the least they could do is have an NPC that mentions properties.