>>58266460Allow me to briefly invoke Wittgenstein
>The meaning of a word is its useIn referring to Venusaur or フシギバナ regardless of language chosen, the usage isn't about the name mattering specifically, but about the association to the idea of the concept of a blue creature(inspired by the Beelzebufo) that has a flower, leaves and vines on its back.
After all, words aren't real tangible things, they are arbitrary inventions used to convey and represent information and ideas
If the meaning is understood, the specific word doesn't actually matter
Instead of calling the Pokemon Venusaur or フシギバナ I could call it "Frogdoglionthing", and if everyone who saw me referring to it as such knew which Pokemon I was talking about instantly, it would be equally as valid because the concept was relayed just as effectively, which is the purpose of language and communication
You are focused purely on the surface level aesthetics of speech, and not the meaning of it
