>>38002857dude. you might be joking. BUT.
this would actually be an amazing way to do void type like
>>38002273was talking about. the game already handles ??? (typeless) in a couple instances - the move curse has this type, and that pure flying genie legendary can have ??? type for a turn if he uses roost.
so why not just add ??? as an actually used type with weaknesses & resistances?