>>16260697wait a minute, I think you have the thread number wrong. It's in the url after /res/ or in the OP title
>Anonymous 11/26/13(Tue)09:32:01 No.16260187in this case it's 16260187
I just tested it on my win7 laptop from a fresh install of the application, and it seems to work. Could you try to search for the terms found in the picture?
>>16261081Yea those features are not implemented yet, I had to release it disabled since there was a bug in the previous version.