>>34330998What do you mean it had "no impact"? There was an entire arc of her development centered around her flaw that she was indecisive. She lacked a goal in her life in a world where everyone had a passion. She had a few hobbies but like her mother told her, she had no goals. She was a character that is relatable for many people, both young and older, who have no career choices and are emotionally stung by it when their friends all have clear careers or passions.
The fact that it was brought up only slightly for the first 50 episodes is just like real life. Some people spend years not knowing what to do. They just put it aside for other things, like the fact that she focused on her crush for Ash.
The only reason why Serena's character got away with it is because of the way it was portrayed. She clearly had a problem with not having goals and it was shown as a direct flaw in her character. This is what makes it different, and better, than just a character with "nothing to do". The lack of "doing stuff" was intertwined with her development in an entertaining but realistic way.
Kids, especially younger girls, look up to Serena because of how much she tried after finding her passion. I work at conventions and have seen many kids dressed as Serena. I ask why and the parents say it's because they like her. This is very important. Serena's development and character actually affected people in a positive way. That is why she is a successful character.
So no, she didn't have "no impact".
