>>39543940>You've simply agreed that... to detain pokemon.Except its not special its shown to be routine. The larger point, pokemon are not held to the same standards as humans. They are held apart, therefore our laws don't apply to them.
>Yes, as I already stated, they wouldn't be kept in a human prison.They aren't being held in a prison at all, they are being separated from their criminal element, ie their trainers, they themselves are not being treated as criminals. They are being treated as pets being removed from negligent or incompetent owners.
>Argument Invalidated.Wrong. Real live. Arguement that my arguement is invalid has been invalidated. Learn to logic, I don't have to prove a negitive, you have to prove a positive.
>Just like human ....by armed and specially trained guards.Point was you argued they needed 'special containment procedures clearly not if they are letting frolic in fenced off fields freely and eat food out of troughs and dishes out in the open. Again THEY SHOW THIS.
>If the pokemon are detained for the crimes just as the humans areThere is no evidence that they are. Your argument is invalidated.
>pokemon are capable... for their actionsNon-sequitar, so can a child but we still don't hold them culpable until they are adults. Just because a pokemon is intelligent doesn't mean its subject to human law or held as responsible as a human would especially since humans use technology which modify their behaviour thus bringing up the arguement can't you really hold them responsible when you are literally fucking their head. Arguement Invalidated.
>Additionally, animals in the real world...a threat to societyThere are these things called reserves, they exist in the pokemon world.
>A pokemon that shows a willingness to commit crimes isn't going to just be set free.A pokemon can't commit crimes its not human. If its violent its being detained for the same reason you would a violent dog, not because its being charged with a crime.
