>>30776113it just baffles me that they used to do with with 6 nearby, and 3 sightings, but after months of extensive ''''testing'''' its now downgraded so that it only shows the sightings if 3 or less are 'nearby' (which includes up to about 800m away)
why they hell do they consider things that far away before sightings
>>30776136say that online not to my face see what comes about