Quoted By:
>Defense Force.
Am I a power ranger or something?
>Why should I buy this game if it doesn't meet mine or someone else's standards?
Don't. Just keep whining away. Just not her. Maybe they'll care on Twitter or reddit
>Why should I get Home? Or Sleep? Or any of the countless spin-off games they're trying to sell me
How do you know they'll cost money?
>if I disagree with their business philosophy going forward?
What change in philosophy? That you can't play with delibird every game?
>All I wanted was a compromise.
No. Your demands are every increasing where you want thousands of mons in a game and a carbon copy of Botw instead of a real pokemon game. It's insane to say the least.
>Some great big announcement that made it all better. Made it worth my time.
Not all the announcements are over yet.
>But the more I looked back over the years, the more I realized that the removal of features actually became Pokémon's overall biggest feature.
Removing content is something natural. Does Botw have a hotshot, grappling hook or Werewolf form? Does Mario Oddessy have a frog suit? Just because some things are different doesnt mean that it can't be better. It's called change. You have to stop living in the past
>They get rid of interesting concepts immediately instead of expanding on them further.
Megas weren't interesting concepts. They were just powercreep and a complete mess lorewise
>They do it in the name of trying to preserve those game's integrity
No GF did it because Gigantamax and megas are just redundant in the same game
>It's not fair to me as a paying customer that if I wanted to try out the Pokéthlon, for instance, I can only play Heart Gold and Soul Silver, because those are the only games in the series that offered it.
Why are you still nostalgic over the something that was nearly a decade ago. There has been a lot of other things that have been added. It's time to grow up and look to the future instead of wanting the same things rehashed 800 times
