>>52990170>It's an algorithim that you feed information and then it can learn more information later by itself. Of course it was going to learn more because it's a fucking AI!And how exactly does this help your argument? Ignoring the fact that you're applying real world logic to fiction this just means it would be time travel since the AI didn't discover the wish mechanic.
Not to mention the "imagination" machine would have ceased since there's no mind to feed it.
>"a situation or statement that seems impossible or is difficult to understand because it contains two opposite facts or characteristics"Every time I read your posts I always have to grab the ridge of my nose in disbelief because you clearly don't understand English, I'm saying paradoxes are commonly associated with time travel not that they're exclusive to time travel but that idea is clearly beyond your understanding.
Anyway, how about this. If you're so sure an imaginary pokemon would be a paradox explain it. What about it makes it's existence contradictory.
>Yes it's foreshadowing about the DLC is going to continue the story and have nothing to do about confirming time travel just questioningNow you're just parroting arguments used against imagination swapping imagination for time travel.
