>>39624463To be honest I'm not particularly proud of that piece of artwork for it myself. Pic related is a better representation of the design I wanted to make. It's more "whimsical" and "innocent" in a sense. Not so much a focus on pseudo ass cheeks.
Now that isn't meant to entirely take away from the issue some seem to have with it. Was it intentionally designed with some sex appeal? Yes. But don't think it's the only thing to take away from it. Also it's a based on things that have either somewhat or blantant sex appeal so I believe whatever sexualization anyone perceives it has, imo fits with what I was going for.
