>>55666810>What exactly opens the door?Well, it's one of those things we just have to play by ear, it's a broad subject with a lot of differing opinions.
In my opinion, I would say posts that can just be boiled down to "transparently horny" are a no-go. That cute scene from last week with Azelie at the pool with a bunch of Water-Types has fanservice (cute blonde in swimsuit) but also has more going on with it than just "cute blonde in swimsuit." It's sexy, but there's nothing sexual to it, it has the same energy as an episode of the OG anime.
Something risque would be like whoever posted Ditto-lust and nudes with cheap censor bars in the last thread. That's the kind of content that doesn't actually invite discussion beyond "transparently horny." Nobody here should be offended by that, but there are literally dozens of threads in the catalog where that content can be discussed at length, while /tog/ is the only constant thread that's focused on creative writing.
Keep /tog/ in /tog/, keep horny in horny. I think the thread has a lot in common with the golden years of /tg/. You can be horny in /tog/, but that should actually contribute to something greater than just justifying and satiating fetishes. There's ERPers in other threads and other websites to help with that.
