>>50729731Pixel-style in general ages well. Pokemon had strong points, but many mundane points that don't compare to other pixel-based titles of the era. That being said, you gave me a good breakdown to a lot of the complaints this board has. They always complain about the new, and reminisce for the old (which they were complaining about before the new), so I can never tell when the love of something is sincere, or out of spite for something else.
>>50729847I don't see why not. They can afford to do so. Would they even miss the potential $100k or even $1m pricetag it might cost to hire the company? We all know they'd make hand over fist on the title.
