>>36082655>>36082675American, British, same thing.
>>36082658Classic asshurt gen 5 year old post.
>>36082713>Yeah, I'd much rather use the same Pokémon every game.Meanwhile, everybody who isn't a brainlet wants both new and old so they get the choice of what to use. If a new gen is filled with abominations as bad as the garbage gen 5 brought to the table, then it's obvious why people would want this. I'd rather use one of the older gen mons than the Pidove, Timburr, Herdier.....basically every early-mid game Pokemon line from gen 5 is hot garbage actually.
>But calling Serperior and Emboar hideous?Yes, they're hideous too.
>Matter of opinionIt isn't opinion at all actually. Gen 5 Pokemon are low quality piles of shit which do a disservice to the series as a whole.
Liking Vanilluxe only further outs your objectively shit taste.
>No, that's have to go to Kalos. Doesn't matter what you think of gen 5, gen 6'd gym leaders were uninteresting and forgettable.I remember Kalos's gym leaders, I don't remember gen 5s.
That being said Kalos's gym leaders are just as bad but gen 5 still has worse.
>Great, I don't care what other people think.Spoken like a true child.
>And they've done a piss poor job, because 6 and 7 are complete dogshit.Gen 6 brought a dex which has the best ratio of good pokemon to bad Pokemon in the entire series.
The rest of the game was mediocre at best but that one good side means it's forgiven for that.
Meanwhile, gen 7 (USUM) is just straight up the best gen in the entire series.
Best difficulty in the series, varied areas, totems > gyms, regular NPC's actually have hexaperfect Pokemon, big name NPCs have hexeperfect IV's, optimal EVs, natures, abilities and movesets on their Pokemon (Guzma literally has a +252 sp.atk, +252 speed modest intimidate hexaperfect newly buffed Masquerain which had /vp/ in tears because it was sweeping their teams) and gen 7 has a good ratio of good to bad pokemon too
>>36082781>That teary eyed cringe worthy post 