>There are plenty of societies where people do not build homes, grow crops, herd livestock, use medicine as we consider it, use much technology, heal the sick or injured in the sense that we would, or have organized distribution of resources. I don't think that that's a desirable state per se, Why would you ever want to live in that society? No home/shelter means you're exposed to the elements and die in the rain and winter. Without medicine people in mass would die from infection and illness.
When I say "Standard of living" I mean food, shelter, medicine, and protection whether by animals or other humans.
>>40664994I think the problem with some people that they let themselves and their identities become so attached to a certain political ideology that they can't separate it from themselves, and see others critiquing the problems of the ideology as a personal insult to themselves. You see it in communists, capitalists, socialists, etc.
