>>47456471>huh 1v3?memes
>huh 3v3 with only 1 role?memes
>huh 3v3?memes
>huh more evidences of a unit being good?memes don't care lalala
>>47456479>arguments? no, it can't be you are *checks list of buzzwords that may save your life into an internet argument* yeah you are X anon so now i win gg
why are you like this?
are you one of those who goes writing on his blog that he didn't lose and is still winning?
and still no mention on what pairs you think are fair tier for comparison, interesting, i guess you'll be in your soundproof room, still screeching iat some unit you don't like while the rest of the playerbase has already moved on and uses it more often than before
