>>50624484>do all of you faggots remember yesterday when you said it had nothing to do with this?no. the reference was obvious, no one said it was unrelated.
>that everyone was "obsessed" and an "incel" for saying they were making a le heckin chonker reference?i would put $2,000 down on OP being an obsessive incel, so yeah you probably got called that by someone else too
>well you can go fuck yourselves, dishonest trash*record scratch*
*freeze frame*
*schizo time*
pic-unrelated but it made coomers read this
