>>54963833>You can look at Incineroar and instantly tell what it is.Okay? so you looked at incineroar, and thought "Oh wow! his fighting spirit bursts from his sacral chakra(famous in Hindu culture and alt chicks) which reflects ego, which strengthens his theme as an egotistical wrestler whose flame gets stronger with praise?"
>nothing about its design implies it will dieyou're a real bright one. a flame is famously a symbol for life force. The flame being a visible biological feature of charizard, something that is constantly burning, implies that if it goes out, then something is wrong. Also what does this have to do with incineroar's fighting spirit being poorly communicated? Oh what's that? You can't defend a point without deflecting or strawmanning?
>Then why the fuck did you use an example that doesn't have any more inspiration than Charizard does?because showing something with a more intricate concept and lackluster execution proves my point better?
