>>50857979>>50857858>>50857738Lack of consistency means that of the mods we get visiting /vp/, most don't care, but one or two does, or that we just don't get much moderation gracing us with their presence at all.
"""Technically""", softcore stuff, SFW stuff and such isn't against the rules anymore, Pokemon or not, though you can tell there's at least one mod that hasn't learned about the rule change, despite it happening something like two years ago.
Outright porn and nudity is banned, yeah, but fawning over curvy Pokemon and scantily-clad women is fine within the rules.
OP's image is leaning too much "no", I think. There's enough curves there to justify calling it a "nude" image, despite nothing being shown.
Not that lopunny is really all that SFW in design, t.b.h. 