>>39407458Here is this word again, "entitlement".
Here is how it actually works boy. Criticizing a product for looking like crap is not entitlement. It's basic common sense. There are standards this industry has produced over the years, things that makes you think "ah yes, this game has learnt from its predecessor, it is truly from this era."
Now when people complain about a product with quality inferior to others from 20 years ago, it does not make them entitled, it make them sane human being.
Because that's what you are, insane. You defend a rushed product, come in a thread( and probably many others) showing the flaws in it and somehow attack the customers instead of joining them. You will deflect criticism without any arguments, just to distract us from our goal which is to improve this series we love.
How ironic for
>>39407485 to strawman about my mother when this deep, almost Freudian obsession with a game company blind you to what truly matters: the product you will pay for.
